Child restraint systems delaware
230000001939 inductive effect Effects 0.000 claims description 12.238000009434 installation Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 14.Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.) Filing date Publication date Priority to US57754604P priority Critical Priority to US60798804P priority Application filed by Delphi Technologies Inc filed Critical Delphi Technologies Inc Priority to PCT/US2005/020041 priority patent/WO2005120889A2/en Publication of EP1794025A2 publication Critical patent/EP1794025A2/en Publication of EP1794025A4 publication Critical patent/EP1794025A4/en Application granted granted Critical Publication of EP1794025B1 publication Critical patent/EP1794025B1/en Links Original Assignee Delphi Technologies Inc Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.) Fultz Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.) Granted Application number EP20050757579 Other languages German ( de) Google Patents Child restraint system and method for monitoring installation of the child restraint system Google Patents EP1794025A2 - Child restraint system and method for monitoring installation of the child restraint system Recommendations are provided for field observation techniques, periodic monitoring, and research for education and enforcement strategies.EP1794025A2 - Child restraint system and method for monitoring installation of the child restraint system Other types of CRS misuses were also observed and recorded in the study. Most common critical misuses were loose harness straps and loose vehicle SB attachment to the CRS. By weight class, CRS use was 97.1% for children less than 9 kg (20 pounds) 86.4% for children between 9 and 18 kg (20 and 40 pounds) 41.7% for children between 18 and 27 kg (40 and 60 pounds) and 10.9% for children between 27 and 36 kg (60 and 80 pounds). Results showed that 62.3% of these children were restrained in a CRS 25.9% were restrained in a safety belt (SB) and 11.8% were unrestrained. CRS use and critical misuse observations were collected in the Fall of 20 children less than 36 kg (80 pounds) in 4126 vehicles in six states: Arizona, Florida, Mississippi, Missouri, Pennsylvania, and Washington. This project addressed use and misuse of child restraint systems (CRS) in the nation.